Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AlphaFrog
I didn't say "it's not a real religion" in the same way people here say that Professional GLOs aren't "real Greeks". It's not classified as a religion because of a lack of dogma and belief in a creator or god. But just because it's not classified as a religion, doesn't mean I'm saying it's some made-up nonsense. Buddhism has some great ideals. And if you want to get really into it, you could argue that ALL religion is "made-up", it had to start somewhere.
As far as it being non-sequitur...like I said, you could be a Buddhist Muslim, or a Buddhist Presbyterian for that matter. I know you probably meant your statement that you left the Presby church and now you are a Buddhist (or to become a Buddhist), but to someone who didn't know that you aren't Christian, that doesn't mean that's what happened. You wouldn't have to leave a Christian church to follow Buddhism.
I know it's your thing to jump to extreme conclusions, but really, you have taken what I've said and ran with it...very, very far away from what I originally said.
|
Have I?
Questions:
Why is it your place to tell me that Buddhism is not classified as a religion?
Why are you attempting to speak with such authority on the subject of Buddhism?
Whose definition of "religion" requires belief in a creator or god?
I don't see a difference between saying "it's not a real religion" and saying "it's not a religion." I also completely disagree with the statement that someone can be a Buddhist Muslim or a Buddhist Presbyterian. I do not believe that one can be Buddhist and Christian or any other religion. It's fine if you disagree with me. However, it's not fine if you expect me to accept your statements about Buddhism as true.
Also, despite the fact that you've offended me, I'm trying to be respectful and not resort to personal insults. I would appreciate it if you would do the same.