Quote:
Originally Posted by SummerChild
Discrimination based on what? Well it wouldn't be race b/c they serve plenty (probably mostly) AA and this was this man's race. There wasn't a constitutional right to eat fast food last time I checked. Any of my fellow JDs got ideas on the merit of such a discrimination suit. Guess it might be weak equal protection claim based on weight classification. Are there any substantive due process rights that this sort of discrimination might bring up?
|
im not up on my legal jargon... but i just meant that they couldn't not serve because "thats not the kinda food a man of his size should be eating."
it would be like a salesperson not selling a tube top to a woman who visibly shouldn't be wearing one. you cant say, "Well a woman your size shouldnt wear this..."
Or like denying someone with a super emphysema voice a pack of cigarerettes at a 7-11. (yes! i knew a better analogy would come up, thats the 4th one i typed)