Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
A lot of them make sense, and in some ways it's better to have things spelled out than some of the hazing laws that are so generic they can apply to anything.
This strikes me as a laundry list, though, and as Snake says, a real study in micromanagement.
|
And what's more, in five years, some campus bureaucrat is going to want to justify their existance, and add things to that list. At that number, does anyone expect 18-19 year olds to consult the list every time they plan an event or pledge activity?? That's an idiotic expectation.
Every time I think about the laundry list, I think of more problems with it. For example, there is absolutely nothing to differentiate between some of the more innocuous things on the list, like maybe an event for pledges only, and a more egregious offense. They're both on the list, so are the penalties for violating those things the same?
The more I think about it, the more I see a list that looks like it was put together by a bunch of college freshmen and an advisor thinking up all the bad stuff they'd heard about around campus and writing it down. It seems more like the product of a brainstorming session than the product of a serious administrator wanting to better the University and the organizations around it.