Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SOLOMON_1906
Mr. 21,
I think I see where u are going...BUT
Even though people "claim" they would not vote an openly gay person in their organizations, it still doesn't make it worthy for research.
I wouldn't vote an ex-con in my frat or a wife beater or a drug user for that matter but neither of those groups are worthy of research or publicity.
|
oh well hell, lol...i wasn't commenting on whether or not it was research worthy....i just figured it was more discourse on gays in bglo's (which in itself is an overdone topic).
but i think the topic gays in bglo's" is research worthy. if it's worthy doing research for gays in the military, then it is for bglo's. fraternity life is "macho" in itself.....and homos go against the grain in that fashion.
homosexuality (as opposed to cheating/womanizing, ect.) is one of those things that people do not really overlook or let "slide" very often, thus it is an issue when one tries to get down. not that it's right, but that's just how it is.
if i was doing the book, would i add it? probably not, because the reasons i listed in my previous post. but would i say that it's worthless info? not necessarily.