Chill out...holy shit. I just didn't expect MSNBC, Fox News, etc. etc. to get that wrong.
Furthermore, he was appointed, yes...which means he holds the position. He is running for the position again...so there really is nothing wrong with calling it a re-election. I really don't know why you insist on arguing the topic.
Quote:
Originally posted by MysticCat81
Ignorance? Assuming that because he's in office now it must be a re-election campaign? Not paying attention or doing the research? Not caring enough to get it right? Not letting facts get in the way of opinion? Repeating a mistake they heard from someone else?
Take your pick. And take it into consideration in giving credence to anything else the talking heads are saying.
|