Quote:
Originally posted by TonyB06
...dude, didn't you call her a "lying skank" like two pages ago? I'm trying to follow your logic.
|
Yes, I did, and if she was a 6-figure corporate lawyer in the same situation, I would say the exact same thing.
Quote:
|
Are you saying she rolled in a party on a group 40 deep simply because her "legal priviledge as a woman and the deferential treatment she gets from the law and the government as a result merely on her word alone" let her know, in advance, she could cry "rape" and get away with it? I'd think she could have found ways to have way more fun at much less risk.
|
No, I am saying she is crying rape simply because her legal priviledge....etc, etc. As far as her finding ways to have more fun at much less risk, let's just say with today's women, I learned never to underestimate the lengths they would go to "teach someone a lesson".
Quote:
|
I don't know at this point whether she's been truthful or been lying. Since I wasn't there, I agree with LIL JUICEY's thought, wait and see what the evidence suggests. But I'm not following what you're saying here.
|
The [DNA] evidence already suggested there was no indication that sexual contact occured. What more are you looking for?
