Quote:
Originally posted by Rain Man
Just FYI and speaking for myself only:
My basis for asserting that she is lying has absolutely nothing to do with her profession (though let's be honest; it doesn't help her standing in this case), it has everything to do with her legal priviledge as a woman and the deferential treatment she gets from the law and the government as a result merely on her word alone, irrespective of whether or not it is true.
THAT is what makes me personally suspicious of her and her allegations. Many men have been wrongly imprisoned solely on the word of a scorned woman (with or without the help of a little legal railroading) with no other motive than to be spiteful (and more than a little bit selfish) and that when they cry "Rape", people will immediately come a-running to her side. It's like the little boy who cried "Wolf!"
|
...dude, didn't you call her a "lying skank" like two pages ago? I'm trying to follow your logic.
Are you saying she rolled in a party on a group 40 deep simply because her "legal priviledge as a woman and the deferential treatment she gets from the law and the government as a result merely on her word alone" let her know, in advance, she could cry "rape" and get away with it? I'd think she could have found ways to have way more fun at much less risk.
I don't know at this point whether she's been truthful or been lying. Since I wasn't there, I agree with LIL JUICEY's thought, wait and see what the evidence suggests. But I'm not following what you're saying here.