Thread: sex question
View Single Post
  #3  
Old 11-15-2001, 11:23 PM
James James is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 8,594
Send a message via ICQ to James Send a message via AIM to James
Some random thoughts on the subject . . .

There is such a thing as too much honesty. If withholding certain types of information that is non-harmful increases your chances of building a relationship, withhold away. So telling someone on your first date about your hundred and five sexual partners might turn a lot of people off. The more important information would be if you had an incurable STD. Otherwise the information is as much their business as when you started masturbating: Only if you want to tell them and its not really relevant to them.

If your last boyfriend was the deepest possible chapter of your sexual history, you don't need to share that information with your new boyfriend. We don't need to know that you have absoilutely no virgin territory left to explore, and that you have even done it on the church alter covered with sacramental wine and using all kinds of props Although if you have please send me the story by PM, I'd get a kick out of it.

Number of past partners really doesn't matter, although some guys will feel insecure about it for two reasons: One- we feel we should be studs and should sleep with a significant amount of women, so if your number is the same or higher . . . we feel shamed as men; Two- We believe in the duality of relationship prospects: In other words we sit among our friends and say there are women you date, but never marry, and ofcourse the ones you DO take home to meet the parents. And they are often not the same woman.

And I hate to say it, but often its OTHER women that affect our thoughts about things like this. You women sell eachother out all the time. I have never met a women with a rep that wasn't given to them by other women first.

Note: The greatest turn on the world is a woman totally comfie with her sexuality (cause she can really enjoy herself), and I don't think I would ever stay involved with a woman uptight about her sexuality, way boring, and too many future problems.

Note: One of the the most laughable things are technical virgins. Lets see, they will do EVERYTHING else but intercourse? And usually for religious reasons. Wake-up call, if the God you believe is the standard Christian God he is going to call you on having sex. Look people, if it leads to orgasm . . . its sex. Although I will admit we have mystified the intimacy of intercourse . . . but I can't help but think that it doesn't get much more intimate than going down on a girl . . . especially if I pack a lunch and stay for the day . I mean after that, we really kind of know eachother .

Note: The more sexually experienced the girl the more we (guys) kind of hate you for making us wait too long. If you are a virgin and we wait a while (a few weeks or something ), its understandable, but if you are pretty sexually active and you make us wait a seemingly long time, then you get tedious. I know, I know, I am being insensitive, but so is the girl. I know you have to be ready, but lets face it her body is telling us she is ready (which means she has to be mentally into it also) and she isn't a virgin . . . so why is she making us beg for it?

Sh80er, hey girl, there are 12 thousand people registered (although they can't all be active) there are probably 1 or 2 others equally uncomfortable with their sexuality and therfore still virgins.

Sigmachicard, you sound a little bitter man, Did this girl play you as "that guy"?

Nice posts everybody .

Last edited by James; 11-16-2001 at 01:57 PM.
Reply With Quote