Quote:
Originally posted by kddani
Do you think a group should be accused of hazing based on a photograph, when the context is not known and the accuser was not present at the time?
|
NO. This happened recently to a group I know of. An under-aged drinker had posted pictures of herself doing shots, drinking, etc. that were taken BEFORE she pledged her sorority. In another area of her webshots album, she posted pictures from her current (at that time, anyways) pledge period. "Someone" assumed the drinking photos were from the same period, so they turned notified Greek Life that this girl was being hazed based on these photos. The sorority in question got in loads of trouble, not knowing why. When it was finally revealed they were in trouble over these webshots photos, the girl came forward and was able to prove that the pics were taken more than a year prior to her pledging.
It was a big hoopla over nothing.