Quote:
Originally posted by _Opi_
it's not the fact that they drew our prophet per say...but more about the content of that drawing...i.e. bomb as a turban...get it?
it's offensive..
|
Actually it is the fact that they drew Mohammed as well. And yes they also drew him with a bomb. How is that offensive? Would a sword have been better? Did Mohammed not kill? Did he not kill in a rather Machiavellian manner? Those are rhetorical questions. Mohammed killed and conquered and slaughtered.
I want you to spell out how the bomb is offensive. Is it not a matter of killing? Do many terrorists not use Islam as justification in their killings and jihads - whether in the bombs they blow up school buildings with or the swords that they use to cut off the heads of innocent civilians?
You have ignored the rest of my post as well. Clearly this is not hate. Even a Jordanian newspaper carried it. Hate is what so many Muslims have practiced across the world - from the hate in the media in Egypt to the hate in the Muslim communities across Europe. Hate is the current anti-semitism in the Hitler cartoons that mock Anne Frank and deny the holocaust. Hopefully the combination of Muslim hate, Iranian nuclear ambitions, and the Muslim desire to eliminate innate human freedoms will push Europe to stop the creation of Eurabia.
When Van gogh was killed a while back you seem to have interjected at the time that his work was offensive to Muslims - as if that offense could justify murder (if it didn't, it had nothing to do with the subject).
I have said in the past that I do not know of a solution to these jihadists - which there are a lot of. I think it would be interesting if a new religion was created called "Peaceful Islam" which rejected violence, hate and terrorism, and saw itself as formally separate from the others. At that point it would remove a lot of the gray area. The problem is much more than the "Wahabists".
-Rudey