
02-03-2006, 01:17 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taking lessons at Cobra Kai Karate!
Posts: 14,928
|
|
He's not looking for a real answer. He smokes pot and posts jiberrish all over Greekchat afterwards. You would think he'd STFU by now.
-Rudey
Quote:
Originally posted by KSig RC
I'll answer for you -
a.) Conservative platforms (although not necessarily RePUBlican platforms) have never actually 'hated out' environmental reform; instead, they supported decreased governmental involvement in regulation of business (including environmental concerns). Efficient energy does not run contrary to this - instead, it is actually paramount to efficient business. Part of this is that, if the environment is really that important to people, they'll speak with their wallets, and patronize companies that realize environmental concerns. Do they?
b.) Even if it only became part of the RePUBlican party's platform yesterday, does that make it invalid? Isn't that what you WANT? If you're going to say "F- the GOP for not caring about the environment" then back it up with "F- the GOP for adding it just to look good/whatever garbage", then you're burning the candle at both ends.
-RC
--c.) 'reporklican' was also unnecessary, and really crushed your credibility.
|
|