|
I, like Firehouse, am not an attorney either, but I think you could look at the Healy precedent in multiple ways.
SDS was a truly disruptive organization, espousing values and could be accurately described as anti-government and anti-American.
The University of Florida has 42 categories in its recognition / assessment program. I think a reasonable argument could be made that failing at those requirements doesn't make you necessarily disruptive - especially if you were a decent (i.e. law-abiding) if not lackluster (i.e. lazy) chapter.
|