Again, it's a book review.
Again, the author of the book isn't completely clean.
Again, the "story" can't be verified.
Again, the "story" says the CIA sent a fake bomb to get them to screw up and find out what they know.
Again, the "story" say a Russian Scientist told them the bomb was fake.
Again, the other link had to do with Britain and not us.
So really, do you have a problem with truth, facts, and logic or is it just a need for smear campaigns that drive you?
-Rudey
Quote:
Originally posted by positive14
OK... if the CIA did allow weapons to be sent to Iran (an assertion that came from a credible source in the L.G. article), this would merely be consistant with what has hapened all to frequently throughout modern history. Namely, the US and other countries giving states the capabilty they need to be threatning to the developed world.
Sure... This recent CIA alligation is just that... an alligation - one that would be consistent with our an all too familiar recent history. (I ask again... do you remember the origins of Al Qaeda - hint: when they were fighting the Soviets).
There's really no legitamate debate on the issue except among those people who agree or dissagree with the policy of arming otherwise non-threatning states. Some justify the policy by saying the enemy of our enemy is our friend. (hint: like Al Qaeda)
Do you have a problem with what I am saying... Or is it with the various mainstream news reports that agree exactly with what I am saying?
*Im still curious.......
Again...
Please check previous posts to see where I have made my assertion on the topic and then cited that assertion with various links. - and of course there's an endless amount of other information on the topic in many other places, if you care to do the research.
|