Quote:
Originally posted by lifesaver
Yeah, I'd never know about it if the local columnists werent quoting other columnists from LA, Chicago, etc.
I think the reason we were all so aware of the comments was because we wondered if there was some validity to it. Fortunately, four years later, and again two years later the Spurs proved themselves. Then last year, those same 'asterik' naysayers were the first ones dropping the 'Dynasty' term.
I wish I got paid to be a columnist/commentator. Who wouldnt like to get paid for doing nothing more than having an opinion and a loud-ass mouth?
|
You know, yeah that 99 season just sucked completely. There shouldn't be an asterik for the Spurs, because hey, they won right? But that season just sucked completely. It just didn't feel right, and it's kind of unfair for the Spurs. I'm not sure whether or not people are trying to disrespect the Spurs, but I just think people just act as if that season didn't exist...as it shuoldn't have.
the Spurs are a good team. You are right. Too bad the NBA can give a rats ass about them and the Pistons. It's horrifically obvious that the NBA desperately wants the Lakers and the Knicks to be good. And in college football, you can just totally see a USC loss about to happen. ESPN basically made everyone hate SC. It became like SC vs the world. They made SC into this goliath like creature, when in reality Texas was a great too. UT was right. They were disrespected. Not by SC though. But by ESPN.