Quote:
Originally posted by Blu-Sigh
I completely understand that there are some places where people might not know about Grooves and therefore don't know about GEMs which is fine, but what I am getting at is allowing the actions of a few people paint the picture of an org is not the best way to look at things, but then again to each his own.
|
I know about Grooves. Didn't know they were significant enough to have sweethearts. LOL. Are the GEMS a blip on the radar when folks talk bad about auxilliaries? I'm really curious.
"Stereotypes are bad, mmmmkay." South Park is great.