An observation as I have seen several instances of this in this thread:
When you use black (to designate a group) then you use white (to designate a group) -- when you use African American (to designate a group) then you use Caucasian (to designate a group). You should not say African American for one & White for another in designation, nor should you say Caucasian for one & Black for another in designation.
As for the posts - this is as usual the ridiculous train wreck that always follows any topic where skin color is brought up. I am seriously WTH?!
that people believe someone can not separate the color of their skin from the need to have power & dominate others. Also, as for the % of minorities in GLO's - any GLO - that is not controlled by the GLO itself. You cannot make people of certain heritage, skin color, sexual preference, what have you sign up to join an organization. The people that come & express interest, are the ones from which the members make their selection. You can't offer someone an invitation who hasn't come to any events or shown interest in the group. We are not all blonde haired & blue eyed - there are all different people in every GLO - different races, creeds, religions, sexual orientations, etc. etc. Why does skin color become the only litmus test for the diversity of an organization?
OTW - we need avatars so you can post a picture of your FEMALE NON-WHITE self beside every post!!