View Single Post
  #9  
Old 11-30-2005, 04:04 PM
PhiPsiRuss PhiPsiRuss is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Listening to a Mariachi band on the N train
Posts: 5,707
Send a message via ICQ to PhiPsiRuss Send a message via AIM to PhiPsiRuss Send a message via Yahoo to PhiPsiRuss
Quote:
Originally posted by RACooper
"If WTC7 was taken down by demolition, why hasn't any credible sources come forward to either say they did it - or they saw the demolition team - or heard the explosions (demolitions are loud) - or to say explosive residue was found on the I-beams (after all alot of tests were done on them, even as the paper in question claims)? Conspiracies theories often don't hold up simply because one has to either suspend their disbelief concerning the events, or more importantly suspend their disbelief that so many people can keep a secret"
Excellent point. There are two other issues that WTC7 conspiracy theorists simply do not address:
1) Motive - why would anyone want to demolish that building, and why would they use 9-11 as a cover?
2) What about all of the other buildings surrounding the World Trade Center that were damaged or destroyed?
Reply With Quote