Quote:
Originally posted by Honeykiss1974
I don't have a problem with people promoting the Lord, but if that what you are - then be it. For example, if there are no Chrisitan faith requirments, then how can you expect an agnostic or Muslim to promote "faith in the Lord" - or to even believe your creed/statement of faith? I wouldn't attend a Christian bible study lead by someone that wasn't Christian - no different than a muslim would attend mosque lead by a baptist preacher. Yeah, I know what your university's says, but there are legitimate ways around that. If there weren't, then there would be no social GLOs on campus that have exclusionary clauses. Why risk your testimony by trying to "play around the rules"?
Anyone on GC (especially black folks) knows that I am the LAST person to criticize new BGLOs - I don't have a problem with them either. But when you call it a Christian-based sorority but yet leave out the fundamental basics of the Christian faith that would actually distinguish you from other sororities (I've read the website) then something doesn't add up. I also don't understand why being Christian inspired (like many other black sororities) is such a negative thing. There's nothing wrong with that.
I was going to bow out of this discussion until I was accused of being a "hater" of the Lord's work. LOL Watch ya mouth there. Just because my feedback isn't super positive doesn't have nothing to do with Him.
|
I know I said my last post was my final word, but I have some major problems with the comments beings said:
1) Nobody is paying attention to what I've been saying. I CLEARLY EXPLAINED that whole non-discrimination policy. I don't know any other way to state it more plainly.
2) While everyone is still holding KAG under scrutiny, why couldn't anyone answer my questions about the problems with NPHC organizations? Yeah, I saw the Zeta and the SGRho on here didn't attempt to provide an answer...it's all good though.
3) Who left out the Christian principles? KAG?! Never that... How are we were risking our testimony? Who said that if someone that was non-Christian tried to pledge, they would become a soror? No one said that. I said that if you're eligible, you can seek membership. Am I not clearly stating things? Somebody tell me what's really going on...
4) Who said anyone was a hater of the Lord's work? Because I pointed out how our society is critical of organized religion? An observation is an observation, reality is reality, and that's what that is.
5) Who said I asked for positive remarks? I asked for answers to the questions I presented.
Ok, I've said ALL I'm going to say on this thread, not because of the questions/criticisms, I welcome all that. But because no one could entertain my simple question of how to discreetly advertise.