Quote:
Originally posted by GeekyPenguin
But the Supreme Court DOES NOT HAVE TO FOLLOW ROE. THEY CAN OVERTURN IT.
That's what that proves. My argument is not weak, it's true.
As an appellate judge, he was bound by the precedents of the Supreme Court. As a Supreme Court justice, he is not.
|
Your argument proves nothing. He didn't argue that he would overturn it, he followed it. You have no way of knowing what he would do given the opportunity to do so while sitting on the S.C.
Nor does anyone, hence the weak argument.