My
,
Regardless of its official category (social, service, professional, and honorary), regardless of how many hoops you have to jump through to join, if all you ultimately do is party and/or stick it on your resume, then the entire experience can be viewed as an absolute waste of time. Some Orgs, the NPHC for example, are in many ways a perfect blend of all four anyway, because of the academic standards and focus on brotherhood/sisterhood, community outreach, leadership
and professional growth.
To answer the question,
Quote:
Originally posted by sairose
okay, first to the original poster. I think, honestly, the reasoning for that is if the person was more active in the other group, or belonged to it first. ...I think maybe it's just for clarity (as in, the bigger letters represent the group they are more involved with).
|
^^^ I agree. I don't believe it is or has to be more complicated than that. Moreover, a person who is not part of ABC is hardly in a position to discuss what it is or what its members consider themselves, unless he/she is considering membership. As RedRose stated, "Each organization should do its best, and not worry about anyone else. It's not a competition."