My point is that one can not question the womanhood of someone they do not know. To say that someone is a flunkee and a follower for something they have chosen to do is judgemental. Again I would never say that I am an Angel, that is in the past. I agree with ChaosDST that Delta supercedes that. My point is not o agrue Delta vs. Sweetheart. Which is more important, because I already know this. My point is that Soror's character is being questioned.
How many came in with the minimum GPA? I had a 3.5, does that make me a better Soror? Should I say those who came in with the minimum GPA, didn't have good study habits and they were probably to busy partying? I would be making a generalization. Truth be told there are some people in Fraternity's and Sorority's that are followers. In my experience we have to be careful when questioning someone's character.
Quote:
Originally posted by DST_philoso4
I would say, the diff. btw. pyramid club and angels, diamonds etc. is......they aspire to be a member of DST. Within Alpha, Kappa or which ever fraternity, the highest status one can attain, who is a female, is to be an auxillary (little sister) no one is in the pyramid club forever. They aspire to move on to greater things, which is no aspiration/possibility for groupies. Things have changed since then. I do not even condone groupies like Delta beaux's or Zeta Knights, they're all groupies to me. There is no comparison, why even try? Do you know what this is called? Cognitive Resonance. When we try to condone actions we do, even if others were to do certain things, of equal caliber had we not, then it would be considered negative.
|