|
Well, what also upsets me is that on Fox News they brought on a professor who attempted to shed some light on the mentality and source of the anger that ignited the rioting. As always Hannity and even Combs would ask a leading question and then cut the guest off when they try to qualify their position. He barely got a chance to expound on his viewpoint.
In addition, I don't understand why they brought someone on who was trying to speak on behalf of the rioters just to discredit him, but wouldn't bring someone on to speak on behalf of the nazis and try to discredit them. Of course I don't think they are credible at all, but the point is that when they try to explain their viewpoint and what they see as a mission accomplished through the march, the commentators, namely Sean Hannity since he claims to "share in the anger" of the community residents about the march, could then make them look like idiots the way they tried to make the professor look like one.
|