Quote:
Originally posted by brooklineu
No, she's only basing her opinion of human beings on purely superficial reasons. But that's OK, right? 
|
Too vague.
She's basing her opinion of what kind of person she'd like to spend time with, whether that would mean in a biblical sense or just knocking down a few cocktails, during her limited stay at UCLA.
I don't really feel that she, in any way, insinuated that she was judging these people in an overall sense based upon looks, or social skills, or ability to throw a raging party.
She's obviously looking for one type of experience while at UCLA . . . so she's actively seeking out people with which to have this type of experience. Seems healthy to me.
Plus, since all value judgements are subjective, not only does your definition of 'superficial' most likely differ from hers, but also your ways to define and form opinions on others will be implicitly different - Let's allow that.
Bottom line: in this situation, most of us would not be adverse to meeting someone attractive. How you judge a person "attractive" certainly varies between each of us, but no way is more 'right' than the other. Just different.