View Single Post
  #19  
Old 08-25-2005, 05:21 PM
Unregistered-
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Lindz928
Good lord, please no!



Was it really all that different before? Maybe I just never noticed. Something like one has a talent portion, and one doesn't?
Aside from the talent portion, MAO seemed less commercial to me and put more focus on scholarships (I volunteer on the local level). A woman needs to be matriculated somewhere and have a stellar academic record in order to be even considered as a prelim candidate (for us, anyway).

Miss USAs travel the country speaking on a number of issues (if they're smart enough). Miss Americas have a chosen platform.

It's a harsh generalization, but if I had to draw a comparison...Miss USAs=not too bright. Miss Americas=very educated.
Reply With Quote