Quote:
Originally posted by xo_kathy
OK, so you should really read that link b/c it's pretty short and very interesting. Here's the first couple paragraphs (I bolded the part I found most interesting):
The word “transubstantiation” derives from Latin – trans (across), and substantia (substance). The term is employed in Roman Catholic theology to denote the idea that during the ceremony of the “Mass,” the “bread and wine” are changed, in substance, into the flesh and blood of Christ, even though the elements appear to remain the same. This doctrine, which has no basis in Scripture, first appeared in the early 9th century A.D., was formalized at the Council of Trent (A.D. 1545-63), and was reaffirmed at the Second Vatican Council (1962-65).
So one of the major things Catholics seem to really "enjoy" (for lack of a better term) is also a 'man-made' idea basically...Well, at least if you agree with what the link says.
|
Trust me the theological theory behind transubstantiation is a little more complex (then again so is Luther's consubstantiation). It has more to do with defining the nature of Christ than is does in defining ceremonial doctrines.
As for Catholics enjoying "man-made" ideas... or stuff not in scriptures... well thats basically true - the easiest way to outline the theological argument is Tradition cares as much weight as Scripture - which can in part be summarized by the basic formula of Word, Chruch, Book. The Word of Christ was first as he preached and taught (or 30-33ADish), next was the Church as run by the early apostles, with Peter (33ADish to 65ADish) being the primary one (33AD-100ADish), then came the Bible (books New Testament finally completed 80AD-100ADish).