Quote:
Originally posted by Deke4life
When I refer to the Hegelian Dialectic (doublespeak being a slang description) I am not refering to what you are saying, but rather to those who are manipulating thought processes about the events pertaining to 9-11.
Example:
Thesis
Mr. Silverstein says he pulled the building
Antithesis
Mr. sliverstein says he was taken out of context, but doesn't explain how or what he meant
Synthesis
American people nod their heads as if this makes sense
|
I'm sure you know that the Hegelian dialectic is not automatically a sufficient process for examining any given issue; it cannot be applied by rote or in a mechanical fashion to any given thesis. The reason is that the given thesis/antithesis/synthesis model chosen comes from subjective reasoning, yet has open prejudicial impact upon the examination of the issues within the dialectic structure. This is an amazing case of that facet of Hegel's conception.
I'm openly disputing your application, but beyond that would simply like to point out the irony of using "doesn't explain how or what he meant" as prejudicial language.