Look, the guy was then quoted as saying that he told the FDNY to pull the building, but it fell before that was possible - that's no less viable than your conception of events, but does not carry the burden of proof that yours holds (and you refuse to meet).
Quote:
Originally posted by Deke4life
Hegalian double speak is meant to decieve, and it shoudnt be bought... especially when the answer is right in frot of our faces for everyone to see.
|
I have no idea what this means, friend - please don't tell me you've adopted the common internet shorthand of applying the Hegelian dialectic to any speech you feel is duplicitous . . . how absurd.
If you're referring to the Hegelian Fallacy, then we can talk - but I'm not, to my knowledge, violating this fallacy. I feel that the truth is not, in fact, an equal sythesis of currently known facts, creating a synthetic and fallacious 'happy medium.' I don't feel this way because I have seen NO PROOF to sway me from the thesis and toward the hypothesis.
You have the power to invoke the dialectic, and sway me, but instead you'd rather run jaw about 'doublespeak' . . . spare me the Orwellian paranoia, as I care not for it. I care only for facts, logic, and proof.