Quote:
Originally posted by FSUZeta
for curiousity sake, i read the accomplishments of one of the gold chapters and one of the "poor" chapters. while i don't think trying to accomplish the recommendations of the administration would be bad, some of the suggestions did make me wonder if the chapter was operating in compliance with their national office and that landed them on the "poor" list. for instance, one recommendation given to the "poor" chapter was to have a better officer transition and suggested using university guidelines. now what if the sorority in question was in full compliance with the standards set by their own national office?and as far as the national officers were concerned, their chapter was fine in that area. the "poor" chapters gpa was above a 3.0, hardly poor on most campuses. i realize that lehigh is a tough school, but gheesh.
don't know if this means a thing, but the "poor" chapter had more members than the "gold" one.
|
FSUZeta, I thought the same thing.
Also I looked at some of the older newspaper stories on this and apparently the evaluations are based on is a report presented by actives & alums. I had to wonder - what if one group comes in with some really fancy schmancy Powerpoint and the other just writes it out on paper? I mean, it should be what you actually do, it shouldn't have anything to do with how you present it.