|
PRUSH
This past recruitment our campus switched from SoRush to Prush, but it also used another method to try to prevent "stringing" along.
During the fall semester the MRC's were asked to vote to install this into recruitment. Panhel told us that a member of XYZ at MIT had come up with a mathematical system that used a chapters #'s of their past invites and return rates and would determine how many PNM's a chapter should cut. The numbers would be of the last three recruitment years. We were told that this would increase return rates, the chances of chapters attaining Quota and decrease the number of PNM's who might drop because they received a blow after second round because of stringing along.
This made PRush so much better because it made chapters that dont cut during the first round except for grades, have to cut a certain #. Each night before cuts we received a call from panhel suggesting how many PNM's to cut. And when PNM's received their invites they had a more realistic invite list that might continue on through the recruitment process....
I thought National Panhel was going to adopt the new Prush process for this upcoming recruitment year...what have you heard?
|