Quote:
Originally posted by AOIIalum
There's not necessarily a problem with the AI subforum. As 33 stated, the AI subforum was created because the AI threads were taking over the Alumni forum. Yes, this forum is here to share information and to discuss AI. But it's important that correct info be available.
AI is a wonderful thing and I am thrilled that my own sorority does allow AI. We all know that not every sorority does AI and those that do, handle the concept differently. I think there is concern that in this particular subforum that at times some of the conversations get a little too close to MS issues and just are not really appropriate. Also, global generalizations are generally not helpful when it comes to the AI process. I really believe that it would greatly benefit all users of this forum to have a moderator knowledgable and sensitive to the unique needs of this particular topic. Doing so would go a long way would go a long way to help the AI subforum be a more positive spot for any/all GC members who are interested in the subject.
Let's be realistic, the overwhelming majority of the participants in the AI subforum are those persuing AI and members of NPC groups. Again, it's NOT a knock against the existing moderators or any GCer who was lucky enough to find their home as an alumna! But, it is a small percentage of not only NPC women, but of GC users.
As for a perception that AI is more common than it really is: We (as in the folks who read/post in this subforum) generally know it's a rare honor to be invited to AI with a sorority. But, the perception of a new user may be different and that's part of the concern. They don't think that there's maybe 50,000-100,000 living members of a sorority and there's a handful of AI's each year! But, when you look at a roll call thread with 30+ AIs listed with another 20 or so interested in AI, you could get the idea that it's a common occurrence.
I hope this makes some sense to you, blueangel, and anyone else who's been wondering. If not, I'm sure you'll ask why...and that's okay by me.
Fraternally,
Christin
|
Thank You Christin, I have repeatedly said this or tried to.
AI is or may not be for everyone.
It depends on the Individual and The Organization.
Because AI is so New to may of Us, it is becoming more Popular.
Of course, it has to come from learning what each GLO does.
It has been seen on GC from the many Who have attained AI Status with GLOs and Who have become very Important Members of a GLO.
I stated on another Post that I asked LXA about AI Status. They/We/I did not have an answer and asked why.
They came out with a Position Statement on Our Web Site and Email Listing so stating.
I also do not feel that an Individual should jsut Mass Shop for a AI Situation.
They should look and investigate the most positive GLO that fits with what they both beleive and feel to be a true fit.
But if I was a possible PNAI and read these or some of these Posts, I would ask My Self, why in the Heck would I want to do something like this? Is it or would it be worth it?
Well, for all of the People and New Posters who have joined us, Please look into it.
There are some and then there are others, You each individually must make Your own decission on what You want to do.
Seek and Ye Shall find, ask and there are Many who will help you for information.
Oh in answer to 33,s question or what ever the statement was, that was why AI Sub Forum was started. Uncluter Alum Forum and place it into a more prominent position.
This is and can be a New Wave of Of Men and Women who for some reason couldnt join as an Under Graduate.