Acording to the 911 commision, building number 7 was outside of the debris field of buildings 1 and 2. In fact, there were numerous other buildings 50-100 feet away from buildings 1 and 2 and they had light damage if any at all. Building 7 was located on the oposite end of the block. The government ( 911 Commission) wont even claim that shock from the other implosions aided building seven to fall given obvious incapabilities due to seismograph info and the fact dozens of other buildings were much closer to towers 1 and 2.
What is really crazy is that Lary Siverstein on America Rebuilds ( A PBS Documentary) said that he told the firefighters to pull the building, which is an engineering term for demolition.
here is that clip:
http://infowars.com/Video/911/wtc7_pbs.WMV
Since then Mr. Silverstein denied that he meant demolish when he said pull but has never said what he did mean. Pull is a definite engineering term for demolish. Especisally in this context, I have a hard time beliving he could have meant anything else.
Please refer to the links below for other questions about building seven relateded to its inability to colapse in the manner the 911 Commision states.
Thanks for the input.
http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video...ialpreview2.wmv
http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video...ialpreview2.mov
Dail Up
http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video...review2_mdm.wmv
http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video...review2_mdm.mov
http://www.physics911.net/media.htm --- this website was first formed by a group of physicists, engineers and other scientists who state that there is no way that the official story could be correct.