Quote:
Originally posted by Brain_Damage
Yea London has been attacked a few times. I get pissed when people are like we just have to be nice and the terrorists won't attack. I've actually heard people say that. I'm like it doesn't matter if your nice or not they are TERRORISTS for a reason if you have more than them like everyone in the U.S. has they will kill you just as easily and quickly as a soldier over there. However yea i think people could sympathize but now they can empathize and their eyes are open more and now maybe they will realize the world can't all get along like they think it can. But as a former soldier i really don't care for terrorists or so much Iraqi people that much and this might be a bold statement but to achieve peace there must be war.
|
Trying to achieve peace through war is like trying to achieve love by rape. I hope you understand how dangerous your statement is.
One man's terrorist is another's freedom frighter. The Indians were considered "terrorists" as well as the patriots during the American Revolution. Santa Anna looked at the Texans as terrorist. They weren't called but slave revolts were put down in the same manner as things in Iraq. Would you call them terrorist?
There were no Iraqis involved in that blast according to my knowledge. and I'm 100 percent sure there were NO IRAQIS flying those planes during 9/11 (hell you'd be hard pressed to find any Afganis but I digress)