[Wolfman]

Hazing is a serious issue which must be addressed in the cultural phenomenon in Greek-letter groups, esp. in NPHC organizations. But the practice of branding doesn't quite fall into the niche of how hazing is traditionally been viewed, esp. in regards to how this practice is viewed.

As a 25-year brother of Omega Psi Phi, who was branded 24 years ago, the nature of the practice itself seen as barbaric and gruesome to outsiders would tend to elicit more attention for this reason alone. As an "insider" one knows that to be able to be in the position to be branded, i.e. have been initiated in the Fraternity, is the real focus. The brand ("hit") is viewed as an honour for those who have the privilege of being Omega men. To brand an pledge or aspirant is the fraternal equivalent of blasphemy;it's would be an oxymoron! There are many brothers, who for various reasons(religious, medical,etc.), don't get branded. And as I mentioned before, the Fraternity has officially disassociated itself from this practice, including tatooeing with Omega symbols.

And the thought that someone would go to an "artist" to do this shows a complete lack of understanding of the sociocultural significance of the practice. It is done by someone who shares the fraternal bond and life experiences so that the practice has meaning. It's like a father cutting the umbilical cord or a priest admninistering the oil of chrismation to an infant--both loose analogies. The one who is branded knows full well the risks involved. I was told by brothers how to take of mine so that they would heal properly, and antiseptic precautions were taken.

Making branding as hazing issue is "barking up the wrong tree"-- pun intended.

" Que Psi Phi 'til the day I die!"