|
Talk shows are proving that 90% of Americans are effing idiots who have no understanding of the law.
To boil this down beyond its simplest points; its not that the jury had to believe he touches little boys. Its that the state of californina had to prove the specific allegations of THIS case.
I am sure that most of the jurors (juror #1 even said so), like the rest of us believe he likes to touch the little boys. But the issue here was the state having to prove that he touched THIS little boy, on THAT specific date(s), in the manner alleged (among other lesser charges). Factor in the accusor's whack mom, and lack of actual evidence = not guilty verdict.
I think he did it. Pedophiles dont change their stripes. He'll do it again, to someone he cant buy off and then Creepy McGoo will get thrown in the clink.
I just wish that everyone would quit calling him the 'king of pop.' Seriously, he hasnt had a #1 hit since what, 1991? Last time he had a hit album was 1984 or something. Its like calling Bon Jovi "king of stadium concerts" or something.
Last edited by lifesaver; 06-14-2005 at 04:39 AM.
|