[BabyPiNK_FL]

All the article (the last link posted) constantly and REPETITIVELY debates is whether or not he was an invitied guest which is besides the point. The party was OFFICIALLY OVER therefore I would say the guest list is null and void because it was no longer applicable to whatever was occuring at the house.

Hopefully the fraternity will eventually no longer be harrassed because we can not control the individuals actions regardless of whether or not he was invited/uninvited to the house. Also, I hope it wasn't something I overlooked but as far as I know there was no mention of providing him with the actual alcohol that caused him to be drunk and since he was allegedly not alone, any of his friends accompanying him should have taken closer care of their intoxicated friend.

There was no official mention of a lawsuit, but I'm guessing that the best and most preventative thing a house can do is escort, or have a friend of someone who is undesired (and/or drunk) and present in the house, escort him or her elsewhere to be intoxicated or reckless. (Provided that they are not drunk off the fraternity's alcohol because it WILL get traced back to them)
And not provide or allow for the consumption of alcoholic beverages by those who are underage or known for reckless behavior.

Of course this would keep them on their toes all the time, babysitting everyone that walked in and out of their house and is a great deal of work; but unless they avoided gatherings on the premises period, there would be no other way. People gravitate to fraternity houses and parties for a good time and I have WITNESSED non-members take advantage of not only their hospitality, but their alcohol availability as well. ALL at the expense of the fraternity and frankly, it makes me ILL.