|
From a collegiate member perspective, I can understand how it is unfair to pay the extra money for alumnae to receive the magazine. I can also understand that there are some alumnae who haven't been active since college, and yet it's unfair for them to receive the publication for free. However, there are some GLOs who deliever their magazine to alums regardless of how active they are. My dad is a member of Kappa Sigma and he's not as active as he use to be, but he still receives his magazine without fail.
Is it cost effective? Yes. Is it fair? I'm afraid I haven't been a member long enough to determine that, but I can certainly see both sides of the argument.
|