|
My point of view is that recruitment is an interview. Southern competitive recruitment is scruitizined because there are many more women than there are available spots. So with the supply of PNM's exceeding the number of available new member spots, doesn't it make the most sense to first consider those with the most outstanding attributes and letters of recommendation?
I know that if it were an employment situation and I was hiring a large class of analysts, I'd want the ones who looked best on paper to come in and interview, and then I'd select the ones I got along best with and could see working well together the rest of the team.
How is recruitment any different from that?
Of course any interview process is going to appear shallow-- you are at the mercy of the interviewer's bias! If you don't meet the basic requirements and you don't get along well with the interviewer, why would you be hired or in this case, invited to membership in an organization?
__________________
Click here for some helpful information about sorority recruitment and recommendations.
|