Quote:
Originally posted by ShaedyKD
Does anyone else think that the teams were unfair? Tana had one of the first people that were fired (Bryan) on her team, and two of the most volatile personalities on the show (Chris and Kristen). Kendra had Erin, who was one of the last people to go. She had Michael, who was a slacker most of the time, but he was capable of doing good work - which he did in this task. Danny was pretty useless, but at least he didn't want to sabotage his PM like Kristen did.
|
I think the purpose of those teams were to see how Kendra and Tana handle difficult people. I don't think one team was worse than the other.
Tana got a team of volatile personalities while Kendra got a team of flakes. Kendra worked hard and made the team like her. She didn't talk badly of them behind their backs and she treated them with respect. She made her team want to work for her. Tana was disrespectful to her team so, naturally, they didn't want to work hard for her. I think Tana could have had a great team but she didn't work to earn their respect which is why she failed.