Quote:
Originally posted by UlChiOCutie26
Oh wait, people that are OPINIONATED get offended by pics of "graphic" nature.
|
Don't assume that is the reason completely. It just makes you look stupid. I stated in the other thread & I'll say it again here.
"If GC allowed pictures in signatures or even avatars for that matter I know I personally would never be able to visit GC while at work in fear of inappropriate pictures. There are many people on here that visit GC while at work & I'm sure they wouldn't want to risk it either.
I have to be super careful because I know 4 people that work my company that were fired in the last year for viewing inappropriate web sites/pictures. I can't risk my job like that. The only other message board I go to has avatars but we're a small community & everyone knows better than to use something distasteful."
And don't forget the argument about bandwidth. I don't think anyone of us could make a safe assumption for or against the argument in regards to how much bandwidth the images might require. Better safe than sorry in my opinion.