Quote:
Originally posted by KSig RC
Is this unilateral for you?
I only ask because there are numerous contradictions and mathematical/historical inaccuracies within the bible - for instance, Genesis is most likely two different stories fused together, as there are completely different (and non-relational) aspects described. It would seem that completely literal interpretation of the bible would become arduous accounting for these - how do you do it?
|
Often, people who claim contradictions are parroting what they've heard. But, it's obvious that your statement is the result of serious questioning.
To answer your question, the Genesis issue is a result of a lack of understanding mythic writing in the Jewish tradition. I have not found any contradiction in the Bible as I've studied. When I find something that doesn't make any sense, I note it. Most often, when I've finally taken in the larger message, the contradiction disappears as it was never a real issue, only my misunderstanding.
*I also wanted to note that when I say that scripture is accurate and God inspired, I'm referring to the message and the lessons. I will be the first to point out some shaky grammar in the NT - at this point, I can only intelligently comment on the Greek since that's what I've studied thus far. Human error does not undermine the authority of the message - in fact, I believe that through some of the human errors, the Holy Spirit has actually been able to convey an even deeper meaning to some passages.
Again, my faith in the God inspired scripture is based on my complete and utter faith in God.
ETA: There is another element to biblical study that you most certainly will not accept: direction of the Holy Spirit. There are so many interpretations of the Bible because people are intelligent and inventive. They have genuine questions and make profound statements.
But, in order to glean the message of the Bible, from my basis of belief, one
must submit to the direction of the Holy Spirit
along with serious critical study.