Pastors and Politics
 

Ok, so I heard this on KLOVE today and I thought i'd get GCers opinions on the topic.

I knowt hat the whole idea of "separation of Church and State" was to keep religion out of politics, but I didn't know it meant the reverse as well (keeping politics out of religion).


Ban on Political Endorsements by Pastors

Do you think that Pastors should be able to mention that "I'm going to vote for Obama" or "I'm going to vote for McCain" from their pulpit (of course without going to the extreme like Rev. Wright)?

I wouldn't mind my pastor casually mentioning that he was gonna vote for Obama or McCain, but I WOULD mind if he said "I'm voting for _____ and you should too because...."

It would bother me if my pastor did that. I think it's somewhat of an abuse of power. But then again, I don't like when celebs do it either. Even Oprah, and I agree with her.

Is there really a ban or is it a condition of tax exempt status?

Does that distinction make sense to anyone but me?

A church could always elect to be taxed just like any other entity and make as many endorsement as it chose, right?

Will someone with a really strong understanding of the tax exempt status rules and background weigh in?

I absolutely agree with every bit of this (except for the agreeing with Oprah part). Specifically for the topic at hand, I wouldn't want my Pastor/Religious Leader talking about politics from the pulpit.

According to the article (and what I heard on KLOVE) its a 54 year old ban (done by the Supreme Court) on political endorsements by tax-exempt houses of worship. If a pastor voiced his "endorsement" of a candidate, his church/synagogue/etc would be in violation of their tax-exempt status and thus be investigated by the IRS.

What I wonder is if there is a difference between saying it from the pulpit or saying it in private. Would a pastor still be in violation if it a private conversation between him and another person?

Not making an actual endorsement also seems pretty easy anyway. Any pastor who wants to be political can address social issues in such a way as to make a implicit endorsement without probably breaching the tax exempt status rules, right?

What's up with this move really? Firing up the perception of hostility on the part of the government for religion?

It seems like kind of a dumb move right now with more potential backlash than real support.

With the consequence only being they would lose tax exempt status and maybe pay a tax penalty?

I suspect that private individuals making private statements aren't limited but if the pastor spoke as a pastor of the church, the church would be in danger of losing the exemption.

It's the latter.

If I could make JUST ONE election law, it would be that a candidate's religious beliefs/attendance/denomination/etc. NOT be mentioned.

I don't know that I'd agree with that. I certainly would want to know if someone was a follower of David Koresh or the Reverand Sun Myung Moon.. or a Scientologist.

I don't believe a religious leader should be talking about politics or endorsing certain candidates. This pisses me the f*ck off, and it's mostly Liberal and Democratic "pastors" who do this (just stating the facts).

If I wanted to hear about politics I'd turn on the news, I don't want to hear that from the pulpit. Religious leaders who do this really lose my respect.

It really depends on the type of church you go to and what sort of faith leader you want.

If a pastor wants to endorse a candidate, and his congregation is cool with that, it doesn't bother me a bit. But the church needs to be paying taxes.

This is the same ADF that was part of suing Georgia Tech for, amongst other things, providing student affairs funding to the GLBT group on campus because some of the events they held had too many political overtones. PLEASE.

Throughout history, anytime people in any society think that public policy is or should be dictated by men who talk to God, it's been bad joojoo. What a recipe for disaster this could be.

Then again, this is America, we should be able to freely express our ideas. is there really a huge difference between the devout following some talk show hosts have with regard to public and political opinion and that the relationship which might exist between someone and the guy or gal at the pulpit?

With the choice of religion we have these days, might "blue" folks seek "blue" parishes and vice-versa? Don't we all sort of do that already?

The difference between us and say.. Iran is that we have several thousand churches while they have one which is exceedingly dominant. There's enough diversity, I think to stave off a blending of church and state.

A huge part of my faith is social justice, which means we talk politics. We even have a presence in DC and when bills are going through of interest to us, we know about it. However we do not and will not candidate endorse. If my religion stopped having a focus on social justice I'd leave it. My pastor and other community members have a peaceful protest every Friday night where they meet at Friendship Square and some people do bring signs or get into debates over the war, but he is doing it as an individual, not my pastor (though it is a small town and everyone knows he is the pastor of my church).