![]() |
How Obama Won — and May Win
http://buchanan.org/blog/2008/06/pjb...n-and-may-win/
Great article by PJB, seems to provide a pretty simple path to victory for Obama, if he can do it. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Pat Buchanon is discrediting Obama's success under the guise of providing a historical perspective to everything (I can detect this because I remain skeptical of candidates and didn't take Obama seriously beyond his oratory skills and his ability to walk on water and have a cult following). Kind of like Buchanan's "memo to whitey." Buchanan gives conservatives and Republicans a bad name. I used to agree with some of the things he said until his recent comments outed him as an idiot with a platform.
It is interesting that black folks are the "Jesse Jackson quadrant of the party." Very interesting indeed. Very loaded. Republicans are definitely going to make Obama the issue instead of the platforms. Platforms don't matter too much anyway because what a President does in office can always deviate from the election platform. However, I call this the "anything but black" syndrome. Republicans may say "we cannot entrust America with an exotic and radical figure." But for many Republicans and nonRepublicans this is just a race-neutral way of saying "we cannot entrust our beloved America, in a time of war, to a black person. This is no time to experiment with Black History firsts and progression." Mark my words. NO...NEW...BLACK PEOPLE. |
Quote:
Perhaps the Jesse Jackson statement was loaded, but with Obama polling as high as 90% among black people there is certainly a correlation there that goes beyond political views and affiliations. Either way, despite a few sentences that you viewed as racist, did you disagree with the article? If Obama can gain a sizable portion of the working class vote that Hillary had then he will win. |
Quote:
What happened to the old ones??? what's the difference.... waaaaaiiit.....o goodness...i just had a Boondocks episode one flashback...... 'nuff said. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
LOL, wow, was the title of that article misleading! As often as I find myself in polar opposition to Pat Buchanan, I couldn't believe I was about to click in to read him write about how Obama may roll over McCain and take the White House. And I didn't. LOL. If anything, that blog is a post-mortem endorsement of why Clinton might have been the stronger Democrat candidate. I do think his final observation, though, is Obama's ace in the hole. Just like Reagan, Obama can win on personality if he plays his cards right. McCain is a decent guy, but sorry, in the one-on-one debates, he is going to come across as old and stuttery and stiff compared to Obama, if he's on his game. If Obama picks a good VP candidate, he still has every opportunity to deliver the White House to the Democrats.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I highly doubt that if McCain wins this election, it'll occur during the debates. Now if he picks Romney or Jindal, who would both fare well against pretty much any Democratic candidate, that could help. But if McCain wins, it'll be because the GOP political ops turn the public opinion. |
Quote:
Or McCain could try something along the lines of Reagan/Mondale..."I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent's youth and inexperience." |
Quote:
|
John Cusack on McCain = Bush
I'm sure the mere mention of "Moveon.org" will make some of the heads of our friends here explode :), but I love love LOVE John Cusack (I know that the page this is on is a shameless push for money, but I don't care, I love love LOVE John Cusack :)): https://pol.moveon.org/donate/cusack...906-JAfR5a&t=4
|
Quote:
However, there are few things in this world funnier than when an entertainer tries to inject themselves into political discourse. Please stick with reading movie scripts. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.