![]() |
Al-Qaida's No. 2 defends deadly attacks
I just about:
1)fell off on my chair when I saw this 2) Thought about putting this into odd news stories 3)Then just got depressed Al-Qaida's No. 2 defends deadly attacks CAIRO, Egypt - Al-Qaida No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahri, rejecting criticism of attacks by the terror network's followers that have killed thousands, maintained Wednesday that it does not kill innocent people. His comment came during a 90-minute audio response that was billed as the first installment of answers to the more than 900 questions submitted on extremist Internet sites by al-Qaida supporters, critics and journalists in December. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080402/...a/ask_al_qaida http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23925477/ http://www.reuters.com/article/topNe...edName=topNews |
What your shocked that a fanatic only sees the reality they want to see?
People believe lots of messed up crap based on ideology, so why should one of the clowns that spreads his twisted ideology be any different than any of others? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I guess I'm looking for active, open public condemnation, not merely a willingness to say when your among non-Muslim friends or other moderate Muslims that the extremists are a problem. I think the number of Muslims who are willing to publicly condemn Muslim extremist is much smaller, mainly because Muslim extremist might kill you for doing so which again is the threat that no one wants to openly admit that they are bowing to. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because we are familiar with Christianity and "Western" culture we understand the nuances and differences of both the ideologies and the rejections of said ideologies - what's more is that we are also 'immersed' or connected into our society so we are more apt to hear/see even the "half-assed" rejections. We aren't connected into or apart of the "Muslim World" so we aren't as likely to either hear or see anything unless we either make an effort to look outside of our world or that the media choses to report on (admitedly with the state of American media: self-focused "mediatainment" it's a little more difficult for you). Quote:
So for example how many "Christians" condemned or rejected the hateful and ignorant comments of Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, or Franklin Graham when they spouted of about Islam? We in the West are just as guilty when it comes to not rejecting, or hell even accepting, the rantings and ravings of ideological assholes - the only difference is that our assholes are on top so they haven't radicalized "too much" (although some have on the fringes - Christian Identity, Christian Patriots, FLDS, KKK, etc.) |
A big difference between Muslim and Western culture is that their Pat Robertsons, etc. are in important governmental and judicial positions.
Pat Robertson tried to run and was laughed off the stage. Your comparisons don't really hold up. |
Quote:
I know a lot of people who condemn Jerry Falwell et al just on basic principle, and that might be why we don't hear specific condemnation of what they say about Islam. If they advocated Christians to use suicide missions to kill Muslims in terrorist attacks so that they could become Christian martyrs and win eternal reward, I suspect we'd hear some specific renunciations though, so I'm not sure the issue for Muslims is simply that they find the extremist already pathetic enough. Your use of Falwell is interesting. As nuts as he is, consider his response to the Hustler parody and imagine a similarly extremist Muslim's response. Somehow I don't think an extremist Muslim cleric takes the case up in civil court, but maybe suggesting incest with his mother wouldn't fire him up as much as cartoons of Muhammad. |
Quote:
Quote:
... and yet the administration is still rife with Evangelicals and Fundamentalists, and President has no problem visiting a campus that celebrated Pope John Paul II's death on - the fact of the matter is that both the Al Queda tools and the "Christian" Right demagogues both use the same methodology in painting an image of "the faith and believers" being under siege by unbelievers and the forces of secularism, the only difference is in the application of "defense" given the respective parties geo-political and socio-economic standings on the global stage. I have no doubt that if the respective political and economic positions where reversed that the "Christian" Right would happily engage in a 'Holy War' or Crusade of their own... and to some extent elements have been both officially and unofficially. The only difference for us in seeing things is of course perspective, we can see and understand the nuances of the different ideologies that operate under the umbrella of "Christianity" and identify motivations and pressures other than pure religion, whereas many can't seem to do that when it comes to Islam - they only picture a select extremist and stereotypical Islam as being representative of the whole, when it is actually the exception by far. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Last update - 05:50 01/04/2008 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/images/0.gifhttp://www.haaretz.com/hasen/images/0.gifhttp://www.haaretz.com/hasen/images/0.gif
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/images/0.gifHamas TV puppet 'kills' Bush as revenge for U.S., Israeli actions http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/images/0.gifBy The Associated Press http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/images/0.gifIn a Hamas TV production for Palestinian children, a puppet stabs U.S. President George Bush to death in revenge for American and Israeli actions. The children's puppet aired Sunday, part of series called "Exceptionals." http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/970562.html |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.