![]() |
An email I received
Quote:
ZAX, Adam |
Have not seen it until now and is pretty scathing towards IHQ and our leaders there.
I will not go into it further. I just wonder if there is smoke, is there fire? I hope none of it is true but a lot of Zetas have been closed in this period of time let alone many others over the years. |
I bet the Lambda Chi Alpha Alumni Association of Tampa Bay is made up of the members of Lambda Mu Zeta at the U. of South Florida who was closed recently for hazing or something, and believed they were wrongfully accused of hazing by AM's who were disassociated, and they felt they didn't get due process to prove that they were not hazing. I saw it in a article a while back, from what I remembered, LMZ at USF was the top fraternity on campus.
|
It's not very well written, and I don't support anything that's not very well written.
|
I received this email as well. I believe it was sent to all chapter presidents or their chapter email addresses. I'm at least glad to see someone has the foresight to mass distribute proposed legislation well before GA. I haven't formed an opinion on this bill yet, but I like that it was distributed ahead of time. I hope the rest of the GA's legislation can be reviewed before showing up in July.
|
An Email I received.
Without examining the proposed legislation carefully, I know that it would not have mattered for at least two of the schools on this list. When the Colorado State University chapter was closed, that University's message was very clear - the president of the University had decided that the Lambda Chi Alpha chapter was no longer welcome on that campus and was to be closed immediately. At the University of Colorado, after two very poor recruiting years, the undergraduates elected, on their own accord, to close the chapter and return the charter. In neither situation would the legislation have any meaningful impact.
|
Pardon my crash, but if their bone of contention is the amount of chapters closed in the last 10 years, the list needs to be those chapters only, not including ones that have closed as far back as 1990-91.
|
I am still not sure of what is going on, the list that was given has happened over I think it said 10 years.
I know for a fact that there were 3 Executive Directors including Bill Farkas at the moment, Tom Helmbock, and Kip Zurker being the previous two. In going over the listing, I see some that I am familiar with some that have been suspended because of Risk Management and rightly so. One that sticks out was Alfred in NY, but the school banned all Greeks on the campus. I think, we must all look at this with an open eye to see what is true and what is not true. We must also look at who is promoting this and why. I would like more information before speculation. |
Quote:
I for one would not want to see LXA try at CU or CSU at the present time - both campuses are vehemently anti-greek, and will be for some time, unfortunately this is mainly the greeks fault themselves, but still....time will have to pass first. |
Alumni are disenfranchised since their chapter is closed without the opportunity to get involved or have input.
That is very misleading, or at least an unfortunate choice of words...I have been involved with several different chapters over the years, all the while being an alumni from a closed chapter (Sigma Omega, which was inactive for 12 years or so - rechartered in 2001).... |
Point of clarification: To my knowledge, Brother Zurcher was never Executive V.P. -
|
Checkout this Issue of the C&C for a Posting on this Subject
Brothers,
Check under the "Update From the Executive Vice-President" article in this month's C&C magazine. It seems the boys from Florida have "notched" things up a bit. Yours in ZAX, Mike Raymond |
Follow-up
Brothers,
I just posted an e-mail at our C&C Magazine site requesting that our Executive V.P. or the Grand High Zeta explain what is meant by the term "burn and turn." I have never heard that expression before this posting. I sure hope that our IHQ can explain what this is all about - a bit of a mystery to me. But I trust that they will explain their actual practice as opposed to this "burn and turn" idea put forward in the original posting. Yours in ZAX, Mike Raymond Quote:
|
I Have To Agree
Quote:
But, I would like to hear from the other side. Just what is going on here? Yours in ZAX, Mike Raymond |
"Burn and Turn"
I too am interested in this phrase. Is it something that HQ actually uses? If so, what do they mean? Or is it rather something that the writers of this legislation created to sway opinions? It appears this letter has sparked something heated.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.