![]() |
Why are we considered "social" fraternities?
I am looking to start some conversations about the nature of NPC, IFC, NPHC and MGC fraternities and sororities being considered "social" organizations.
Many of us have generalized greek-letter organizations into "academic" "service" or "social" but has the latter given us a bad rap as to our nature? Yes we're social, but what about the leadership, service and academic components of our organizations? How can we develop a term that embodies all of these areas and more? What campuses and organizations have given up on "social" and considered new terms such as "comprehensive" or "leadership?" I'm open to any and all ideas and look forward to the conversation. |
Baird's categorizes them as "General Fraternities" rather than "social."
I like that phrase because it doesn't eliminate the social aspect from NPHC organizations, many of which are service or social action oriented. It also embraces the (slightly) new approach to NIC fraternities which seem to be more about developing the total man.... mind, body, spirit....leadership, service, social graces. "General" works for me. |
Who cares? Leave it be.
|
I like the following definition for Social Fraternities and Sororities as provided by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Student Organization Office.
The term "social" in social fraternity and social sorority refers to social development. The original intent of these organizations when they began in the 18th Century was to assist students to become "socialized," that is, directed, with proper consideration of one's future responsibilities as a citizen in society. The individual and the organization's members base membership on mutual choice. Social fraternities and sororities are self-governing and self-supporting organizations. |
Quote:
|
n/m.
|
Quote:
Quote:
And if you saw the pledge books/membership manuals of many "general' fraternities from 50 or 75 years ago and saw the amount of space devoted to etiquette, study habits, attire, leadership and the like, I don't know that you'd consider it a "(slightly) new approach." |
Quote:
If someone had tried to get me to join a "comprehensive" or "leadership" sorority, I probably would have thrown up on their head. |
Quote:
Hope that offended some folks. Leave it be, its worked to this point hasn't it? |
Quote:
That was funny. I belong to a social fraternity, and I'm dang proud of the fact that it is social. |
Interesting question, but Social Greek Organizations do so much more than Socialize as in party!
They or socially involved in Student Government, Chairity Events, Homecoming and Intermurals. Well, I guess that says they are more well rounded than just living in the dorm, hanging out at the Student Center, and doing what ever they do with the few people that they know from class or the dorms. |
Quote:
.....and to say that fraternity members are more well rounded than those that are not is kind of a shitty statement. Me and plenty of guys in my chapter have very good friends at Texas that decided not to go greek, for one reason or another. They are well mannered, from good families, have a large amount of friends, and are no different than your typical Southern "fratty" type guy. To say they aren't as "well rounded" is quite inaccurate. If it takes pledging a fraternity for you to have a large base of friends.......then you have bigger things to worry about. |
Yeah I dunno, I don't like ther term "Social" either. Sigma Nu sort of developed an internal culture of being an "Honor Fraternity". Our founders were southern gentlemen soldiers so they were big on Honor...something we try to maintain in our chapters through today.
But I agree "Social" evokes the party animal image pretty unfair since "Cultural" houses on my campus are just as wild as we are! We get Phi Beta Sigmas over our house as much as other fraternity guests |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.