![]() |
Charlie Sheen Interview
I know that many of you guys are not going to like this post, but I don't really care.
(especially for those who care not to read fully and specifically critique this paper: http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html ) Charlie Sheen, even with his past personal problems, is to be admired for speaking out so firmly on this issue. well... here it is- Charlie Sheen Interview: http://www.infowars.com/video/clips/...een_911_wm.htm |
because, you know, Charlie Sheen is qualified to be a voice of reason on the issue.
BEING FAMOUS DOES NOT GIVE YOU CREDIBILITY ON THINGS OUTSIDE YOUR FIELD. |
maybe only Political Scientists should be allowed to become activists.
|
|
Re: Charlie Sheen Interview
Quote:
http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/sh...threadid=72504 |
Is he to be admired because he agrees with your view? Should it be a big issue because Charlie Sheen has spoken out about it?
I don't think so. Also, your idea of "read fully and critique" seems to be "completely agree with and don't question," which seems odd considering your history of posts. |
If I wanted a celebrity to help validate my point of view, Charlie Sheen would be at the very bottom of my list. Sorry but the guy is a joke.
|
Re: Charlie Sheen Interview
Quote:
-Rudey --Emilio wins |
That quite possibly may be the most mmoronic, skewed outlook on a series of events that I have ever heard from anyone. Charlie Sheen needs to drink a bucket of bleach and do us all a favor...fucking idiot.
|
:confused:
|
Each to His own isnt it?
Amazing, He Plays the President on TV! Much Easier isnt it?:rolleyes: Stars can say what they want and Poloticions want them to do the $$$$ Grubbing!:eek: Oh Well, do on Morons!!!!:p |
Quote:
|
Maybe Charlie's last round of penicillin treatments didn't work so well...
sorry, but I have just about had it with celebs who would never have the forum they have if not for their celebrity. |
Quote:
|
When people condem "celebrities" for using their position as a soapbox, it seems to me that they are overlooking that many of us use whatever position we may have to further our arguments.
In fact, the most obvious to me are the Presidency, the administration and other political offices. Who else can fly off on Air Force One (or other government transportation) to give a speech at (name the organization) in (name the city) to argue in favor of (name the cause), and be fairly certain that she/he will get national media coverage? Who else but the President can basically demand time on prime-time television? Please notice that I use the terms Presidency, administration, etc. generically and am not pointing the finger at either party or any particular President. Both parties use the opportunity. Besides, in the end, any American has the right to use any legal means to get his/her point before the public. Simply because a person is famous doesn't mean she/he should be penalized simply because he/she has a bigger, and more visible soapbox. By the way, are we forgetting that a "loyal opposition" is one of the tenants upon which our country was founded -- which, to my way of thinking, includes freedom of speech, the press and multi-party politics? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.