![]() |
Once a Player...?
Always a Player?
This goes for both males and females. Do you guys think that if someone has a history of dating several people at the same time w/o them knowing about each other (re: playing folks), they will ever be able to be in a monogamous and honest relationship? OR do you think that they will always have trouble being with just one person. |
Re: Once a Player...?
Quote:
The real question is emotional maturity, not opportunity. Whether we're just casually dating or dating "with a purpose," eventually most of us reach a point in life where we're ready for a relationship deeper and more meaningful than anything we may have had before. At that point, a "mature" man will walk past 1,000 available women to reach the woman who touches his heart. |
Re: Re: Once a Player...?
Quote:
|
dating multiple people makes someone a player?
:confused: i figure that's just keeping options open. can't put all your eggs in one basket when you're single. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
it's none of their business. i don't see the point in letting them know about each other unless feelings begin to progress. |
Re: Re: Once a Player...?
Quote:
I'm a "reformed player" myself. I was all about the conquest but I grew up and realized that real life isn't that way. I'm in a strictly monogamous relationship currently. I credit God's intervention 100%. |
Re: Once a Player...?
I'm not sure I would consider this description a player . . .
This sounds like social dating to me, which I believe is pretty healthy. It allows a person to get a lot more romantic experience, meet new and interesting people, and build a mental database on what is actually out there and how different people and behaviors compare to each other. I think in this case, and I don't mean to put words in your mouth, you are using the word player to describe a man that is good with women but sees women more as commodities and as a way of keeping a kind of social score with himself. This as opposed to someone that might just have really good social skills, be attractive to members of the opposite sex, and sees casual dating as good fun. Now will he stop being that way? Yes and no. While he is really into you he should cleave to you exclusively. So as long as you have has interest all is good. However, I have noticed that the purpose of labeling a relationship as "committed" or "engaged" or married even, is to keep the other partner in the relationship when they are no longer as interested as they used to be. Otherwise we wouldn't need labels right? I think in that case the "player" will be more likely to leave you or cheat because . . well they just have that option. They have that option because they are attractive to memebers of the opposite sex and have dated easily enough thats mostly effortless for them. To them dating isn't a big effort in and of itself. So to summarize, I believe that you would have no trouble with a player as long he is in-love with you. But a player will be much quicker to leave or stray if he falls out of love . . . . Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Once a Player...?
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Once a Player...?
Quote:
We repent, and He forgives. :o |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Once a Player...?
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Once a Player...?
Quote:
Hey, how was your Thanksgiving? :D |
^^LMAO hecks naw.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.