![]() |
Putting one of your glos about another
Bottom line on Sinfonia is that we've joined IFC on many campuses, we have houses, we do Greek Week throughout the United States, and we recruit across the campus regardless of major or minor.
Regards, Boodleboy322 |
nothin' wrong with that
Phi Mu Alpha is simply a few decades behind, for there are a good
many of the NIC and IFC types who started out as specialized groups, and the U of Michigan, with their many professional houses....well, it is just that you will have a helleva road ahead. The Boy Scout outfit, Alpha Phi Omega, has gone the other way, to a co-ed club, no house and no social, per se, affiliation. But there's nothing wrong with some PMA's going social. 'course it may be a floor fight at Conclaves and ultimate break up of the old "singing fraternity" but it could be done. Interesting to see. It appears we are in a transitory period with the many ethnic groups with no houses, the co-eds, the multi so and so's and a watering down of identities. Perhaps in time it'll all shake out and we will again have identities and purposes! |
Maybe throw in FarmHouse and AGR! They too are now IFC Members who came from different backgrounds. I am sure there are actually more out there!:)
So called Jewish Houses have also gone onto bigger and better things after they spread thier coverage.:) |
Re: nothin' wrong with that
Quote:
|
Re: nothin' wrong with that
Quote:
|
What's the point of this thread? The OP makes no sense to me.
Is it supposed to be answering a question that's asked somewhere else? |
Quote:
Also aeBOT, Sinfonia is/was(?) an all music fraternity, so they definitely had some of the best musical talent on campus. I'm guess what Erik is referring to, is that some of the silver greys of Sinfonia are not going to be happy with the decision to go more "social" and open membership to individuals with other majors. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Betarulz!, I think you're right in guessing that Erik is talking about the possible reactions of some silver-gray hairs (the ranks of which I am joining all too fast). But we got most of those reactions 10-20 years ago, since the decision to return to our roots as a social fraternity and stop straddling the social/professional worlds was made in the mid-80s and really started to be felt in the early 90s. (Although as I said in the other thread that this got separated from, change comes slowly and at different paces on different campuses.) These days, the only alums one gets that kind of negative reaction are usually those who haven't stayed involved, paid attention to and attempted to understand what the Fraternity has been doing for the last two decades. And JoninKC, I think I'm going to respect my fears and refrain from asking you to elaborate on the "poor pledges." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If anyone's interested I keep a copy, for my own records, of the official letter from Lyrecrest that states we're social from the legal standpoint. Regards, Boodleboy322 |
Re: nothin' wrong with that
Quote:
Gender has changed, we are not co-ed (changeover in 1974/1976) and we no longer official require scouting background (changeover in 1967) but with registering with the local Boy Scout council counting for that, it got fuzzy even as of the late 1950s. I wouldn't say we've moved away from being a social, but perhaps farther from being a professional. Randy |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.