9-11 conspiracy poll
 

Does anyone believe any of the 9-11 conspiracy theories that our goverment allowed the tragedy to happen or perhaps aided in the event?

What do you think about Building number 7?





Broad Band

http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video/...alpreview2.wmv

http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video/...alpreview2.mov

Dail Up

http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video/...eview2_mdm.wmv

http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video/...eview2_mdm.mov

[

I'd put it up right there with claims that the moon landing was filmed in a studio.... not worth even arguing.

The Chicken Little Syndrome...

"The Sky is Falling...details at 11...

It'll become a small industry, like Kennedy's assassination, Watergate, Pearl Harbor, etc., producing books and movies and gossip for years to come.

Some of these late-night talk shows need guests, and these all help fill the time.

Pentagon=Concrete. The stuff they make freeways and overpasses out of.

Airliner=Aluminum. The stuff they make beer cans out of.

In a grudge match, the concrete wins everytime.

Do a test for yourself. Drop a beer can on a sidewalk and see what happens to the sidewalk. Now drop a sidewalk on a beer can and see what happens to the beer can.

Some people still thinks that Saddam was involved in Sept. 11.

What about WTC building 7 at the World Trade Center? No one ever seems to remember it, only towers 1 and 2. The government (911 commission) claims it fell due to fire that fell on it from buildings 1 and 2. But that seems strange given that a modern steel building has never colapsed from fire ... and given that building seven was located on the oposite end of the block. Steel buildings have only come down due to bombs (or in the case of buildings 1 and 2 suposedly planes). Some buildings have even burned for days or weeks without colapsing, such as the tower in madrid spain. Steel doesnt melt until about 2000 degrees.

WTC Building number 7 was not attacked by terrorists and was not hit by an airplane and had minimal fires, why did it colapse on the afternoon of 9-11?

Just some questions that I have always had... and have never been able to get any real answers.
I would appreciate your thoughts.

refer to the links in the first post for more info on building seven, or google it.

I still can't get over that so many people still think that Iraq and 9/11 are conntected.... heck even some of the exchange students that came up here still buy into that "misconception"...

There are literally dozens of options that pass Occam's Razor far better than 'governmental conspiracy theory' and still meet your bizarre recollection of steel-based buildings . . . for instance, how about a combination of heat and simple harmonic motion from two massive buildings falling nearby? Remember that shock from the plane impact and then from the buildings falling caused damage for hundreds of yards, in terms of windows blown out and debris causing destruction.

You're oversimplifying if you're only considering the melting point of steel in the conversation. Think of how little, in terms of raw explosive charge, it takes to implode a building. In extreme circumstances such as 'two skyscrapers falling on the same block' those same conditions could be met through random force interactions.

The "Flight Of The Bumble Planes" theory is still my favorite. :D

What's the theory? I've neverd herd of it.

Acording to the 911 commision, building number 7 was outside of the debris field of buildings 1 and 2. In fact, there were numerous other buildings 50-100 feet away from buildings 1 and 2 and they had light damage if any at all. Building 7 was located on the oposite end of the block. The government ( 911 Commission) wont even claim that shock from the other implosions aided building seven to fall given obvious incapabilities due to seismograph info and the fact dozens of other buildings were much closer to towers 1 and 2.

What is really crazy is that Lary Siverstein on America Rebuilds ( A PBS Documentary) said that he told the firefighters to pull the building, which is an engineering term for demolition.

here is that clip:
http://infowars.com/Video/911/wtc7_pbs.WMV

Since then Mr. Silverstein denied that he meant demolish when he said pull but has never said what he did mean. Pull is a definite engineering term for demolish. Especisally in this context, I have a hard time beliving he could have meant anything else.

Please refer to the links below for other questions about building seven relateded to its inability to colapse in the manner the 911 Commision states.

Thanks for the input.


http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video...ialpreview2.wmv

http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video...ialpreview2.mov

Dail Up

http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video...review2_mdm.wmv

http://70.84.33.210/~infomedi/video...review2_mdm.mov

http://www.physics911.net/media.htm --- this website was first formed by a group of physicists, engineers and other scientists who state that there is no way that the official story could be correct.

Do you also believe that no Jews died in the World Trade Center, since they were all warned at their synagogues in advance?

That's why I wasn't there....

...oh, and the fact that I was over 1,000 miles away from NYC.