GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=59052)

IowaStatePhiPsi 11-03-2004 12:29 PM

adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality
 
The most recent expansion to the House of Representatives was in 1911, when the U.S. population was about 93 million, so a representative had 212,000 constituents. With the current population of 293 million, a representative has 674,000 constituents. To bring this number back to its 1911 value, the House should be expanded to 1370 members.

AlphaSigOU 11-03-2004 01:19 PM

Re: adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality
 
Quote:

Originally posted by IowaStatePhiPsi
The most recent expansion to the House of Representatives was in 1911, when the U.S. population was about 93 million, so a representative had 212,000 constituents. With the current population of 293 million, a representative has 674,000 constituents. To bring this number back to its 1911 value, the House should be expanded to 1370 members.
They'd hafta substantially rebuild the House chamber to pack all that many in there.

IowaStatePhiPsi 11-03-2004 01:21 PM

Re: Re: adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality
 
Quote:

Originally posted by AlphaSigOU
They'd hafta substantially rebuild the House chamber to pack all that many in there.
I was thinking build a new chamber comparable to the Senate in Star Wars: Episode I. All nice and fancy, not Louis XIV

Kevin 11-03-2004 02:04 PM

They could use the Redskins stadium.

docetboy 11-03-2004 02:08 PM

Re: adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality
 
Quote:

Originally posted by IowaStatePhiPsi
The most recent expansion to the House of Representatives was in 1911, when the U.S. population was about 93 million, so a representative had 212,000 constituents. With the current population of 293 million, a representative has 674,000 constituents. To bring this number back to its 1911 value, the House should be expanded to 1370 members.
Why not bring it back to the Constitutional minimum of 30,000 constituents per representative while we're at it???

IowaStatePhiPsi 11-03-2004 03:07 PM

Re: Re: adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality
 
Quote:

Originally posted by docetboy
Why not bring it back to the Constitutional minimum of 30,000 constituents per representative while we're at it???
not a bad idea.

sageofages 11-03-2004 03:12 PM

Re: Re: adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality
 
Quote:

Originally posted by docetboy
Why not bring it back to the Constitutional minimum of 30,000 constituents per representative while we're at it???
There is a thought....we could eventually go to the "corporate structure" of representation with a middle management layer. Representatives for representatives...

I thought we were already headed in the corporation owned government as it is now.

PhiPsiRuss 11-03-2004 03:59 PM

Re: adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality
 
Quote:

Originally posted by IowaStatePhiPsi
The most recent expansion to the House of Representatives was in 1911, when the U.S. population was about 93 million, so a representative had 212,000 constituents. With the current population of 293 million, a representative has 674,000 constituents. To bring this number back to its 1911 value, the House should be expanded to 1370 members.
I once asked my congressman about this. He replied that political scientists who have studied this have determined that once you get around the 600-650 range, the body becomes unwieldy and ineffective.

lifesaver 11-03-2004 04:36 PM

Re: Re: adjust the house of representatives to 1911 proportionality
 
Quote:

Originally posted by PhiPsiRuss
I once asked my congressman about this. He replied that political scientists who have studied this have determined that once you get around the 600-650 range, the body becomes unwieldy and ineffective.
As opposed to how unwieldy and ineffective they are now? lol.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.